Southeast Colorado alfalfa price forecasts, graded in public.

Grading Record — Rows #17–19 and #28

Graded: 2026-10-02. Rows #17–19 frozen 2026-08-27 in research/predictions-2026-09.md; row #28 frozen 2026-09-19 in research/predictions-2026-10.md. Rows never edited after release.

NASS Agricultural Prices, released Tue Sep 29, 2026 (AUGUST prices) — graded by script

Source: https://esmis.nal.usda.gov/sites/default/release-files/796084/agpr0926.txt (saved: data/2026-10-02/agpr0926.txt and data/2026-10-02/macro/agpr0926.txt). Table title verified: "Prices Received for Hay by Type - States and United States: August 2026 with Comparisons" — month-pinned, not July. Graded by grade_predictions.py --apply, then the table was read by hand a second time (L3). July 2026 was not revised for any of the seven states or the US.

#PredictedAnchor → judgmentObservedSource line (verbatim; cols = All hay Aug25/Jul26/Aug26, Alfalfa Aug25/Jul26/Aug26, Other)Outcome
17CO alfalfa Aug $235 (170–300)210 → 235$235Colorado .............: 154.00 222.00 231.00 155.00 225.00 235.00 140.00 175.00 180.00HIT (exact)
18CO all-hay Aug $230 (165–295)207 → 230$231same lineHIT (+1)
19KS alfalfa Aug $155 (90–220)125 → 155$127Kansas ...............: 114.00 123.00 123.00 121.00 126.00 127.00 102.00 105.00 105.00HIT (inside a wide range; point −$28)

Judgment layer vs anchor (the test research/17 set up). These rows were frozen Aug 27. The persistence baseline available then was June (210/207/125), which is what the rows record as anchors. Against it, judgment won on Colorado (#17: 0 vs 25; #18: 1 vs 24) and lost on Kansas (#19: 28 vs 2); MAE judgment $9.7 vs anchor $17.0. July prices (225/222/126) were published Aug 31, after the freeze; persistence from them would have scored $6.7, but that is a later-information benchmark, not a fair comparison. Three rows is not a track record. The Kansas bet (that the state average would follow cash up) failed again — the average moved $1 for the fourth straight month — so Kansas row #42 is pure persistence. (A first draft and the pre-publication review called July persistence the "fair baseline" and said judgment lost; a second review caught that July printed after the freeze. Corrected.)

AMS Colorado Direct Hay Report, Thu Sep 24, 2026 — graded by hand

Source: data/2026-10-02/ams/ams_2905_2026-09-24.pdf (sha256 797319fd
; retrieved two ways: ams_2905.pdf and AMS_2905.pdf, identical bytes), read with pdftotext -layout and by eye.

#PredictedObservedSource line (verbatim)Outcome
28No SE CO per-ton FOB-farm alfalfa trade of any size (NO)YESSoutheast section: Alfalfa - Fair (Trade/Per Ton) / Large Square 3x4 25 250.00 250.00 F.O.B.-Farm/Ranch Weedy 3rd CutMISS

The print is not a grading-target trade (Fair grade, 25 t, under the 100-t bar). It is still informative: a weedy Fair 3x4 lot sold for $250 at the farm in the seller's region. Partial windows (not graded yet): #29 — no SE ≥100-t Good-or-better large-square trade on Sep 24; #30 — no Colorado ≥500-t FOB-farm alfalfa trade on Sep 24 (the 4,320 t is Premium millet at $200 FOB-feedlot); #31 — no NE CO per-ton alfalfa row and no "Dairy" anywhere in the report; #32 — first half: Trade activity Moderate. Demand Good to Very Good all markets of new crop hay.

Summary (from scripts/scorecard.py, 2026-10-02 — never hand-typed)